Laboratory 6.2 “Disperse systems and rheology in clean technologies” within WP 6 “Nano-structured materials and disperse systems in clean technologies” aims at the development of new systems for clean technologies and nanotechnologies in various scientific and technological areas: new cleaning agents for hard surfaces; encapsulation and controlled release of reagents; wetting and dewetting processes. The main objectives are to conduct experimental and theoretical research and development of new dispersed systems through the inclusion of new raw materials and innovative materials, and to develop and apply theoretical models of the interactions and stability of complex dispersed systems. High scientific output of Lab 6.2 is manifested via 21 scientific publications in the fields of Dispersion Chemistry, Chemical and Materials Sciences for the period 2018 – 2024 (8 articles in Q1 journals, 6 in Q2, and 7 materials in Q4). Optimized compositions of cleaning formulations for hard surfaces with sulfonated methyl esters have been obtained [1]. New theoretical models for the interactions that determine the structures in micellar systems have been developed and applied [2]. New phenomena such as vortexing [3] and nanoemulsification [4] have been described. New methods have been proposed for obtaining emulsions and foams from triglyceride phases [5]. The role of the components and compositions for the rheology [6], wetting, and cleaning [7] has been demonstrated.

The research paper explores the ability of isolated multiconnected micellar phases (MMP) to remove different soils (dimethicone, sebum oil, and makeup formulations) from artificial skin. The MMP is isolated from 3 wt% 1:1 sodium lauryl ether sulfate with 2 ethylene oxide group + cocamidopropyl betaine in the presence of 62 mM MgCl2. The direct observations of soil removal demonstrate the efficacy of the MMP by two physicochemical mechanisms. For dimethicone soils, the roll-up mechanism is observed, i.e. shrinkages of the drop contact areas and decrease of the three-phase contact angles due to the changes in the interfacial tension and the surface energy. For sebum soils, the spontaneous emulsification mechanism takes place because of the mixing of the fatty acids present in the sebum with the surfactants and forming complex amphiphilic structures. For makeup formulations, the new approach based on the software image analysis by means of Image J is developed to account for the whole soiled area and to increase the precision of the quantitative cleaning characterization. The obtained results show that the bicontinuous phase successfully removes dimethicone, sebum oil, and foundation soils from the artificial skin and could have potential application in the design of new personal, home and industrial care products.

A systematic study on the mechanisms of cleansing artificial skin by solutions of widely used in personal care surfactants disodium laureth sulfosuccinate (DSLSS), sodium laureth sulfate (SLES), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), dodecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (DTAB), and coco glucoside (CG), is presented. The systematic characterization of soil removal from artificial skin revealed two primary cleansing mechanisms: emulsification and roll-up. Emulsification occurs in systems with very low interfacial tension, such as sebum in SLES solutions, while dimethicone soil was only removed by roll-up. The roll-up effectiveness depends on the surfactant’s interfacial activity and its adsorption on the soiled surface. Thus, the strong adsorption of DTAB on the skin leads to dimethicone roll-up at a relatively high interfacial tension of 11 mN/m. The anionic and nonionic surfactants adsorbed less at the artificial skin surface, and the oil/water interfacial tension value lowering below 5 mN/m is necessary for the roll-up to occur. Nonionic CG removed dimethicone at a lower concentration than ionic surfactants. Combining CG with ionic surfactants improved cleaning at lower total concentrations. Surfactant mixtures are used to formulate simple cleansing formulations, whose performance is also investigated by the developed in vitro approach. The results obtained allow for a good rating of the formulations, which correlates well with the performance of the surfactant mixtures and their interfacial activity.

Spontaneous bubble growths in liquids are usually triggered by rapid changes in pressure or temperature that can lead to liquid gas supersaturation. Here, we report alternative scenarios of the spontaneous growths of bubbles inside a high-saturation-vapor-pressure and high-air-solubility perfluorocarbon liquid (PP1) that were observed under ambient quiescent conditions. First, we investigate spontaneous bubble growth inside the single PP1 phase, which was left to evaporate freely. The bubble growth is explained by the difference in the PP1 vapor pressure inside the bubble and that above the freely evaporating PP1 interface. Next, we study the bubble growth inside the liquid PP1 covered with a layer of a second air-saturated immiscible liquid: low-air-solubility water or higher-air-solubility ethanol. In both cases, the bubble growth rates were accelerated, indicating mass transfer of air from the water or ethanol phases to the PP1 phase. The bubble growth rates significantly increase for bubbles trapped at the PP1–water or PP1–ethanol interfaces due to faster air diffusion through the thin PP1 liquid films separating the bubbles from the upper phases. Finally, we consider the case of bubbles inside millimeter-sized PP1 emulsion droplets in water or ethanol. The bubble growth inside the droplet leads to an increase in the PP1 droplet’s effective buoyancy and to the detachment of the droplets from the substrate. The observed bubble growth rate in the case of emulsion droplets was much faster for PP1 droplets in ethanol than for PP1 droplets in water (minutes vs hours). The underlying physical mechanism of the increase of bubble volumes is the spontaneous mass transfer of both air and PP1 vapor to the bubbles produced by a colloidal diffusion pump effect.

The present study explores the cleaning efficacy of a set of nonionic surfactants (linear ethoxylated alcohol, secondary ethoxylated alcohols with 5, 7, and 9 ethoxy groups, glycoside surfactants, polyglycerol surfactants, and an ethoxylated sorbitan monolaurate) combined with cationic biocides—alkyl quaternary ammonium salts. A simple hard surface cleaning methodology was applied, which was shown to discriminate well between poor and good cleaning formulations. In addition to cleaning efficacy, surface aesthetics such as gloss and haze were evaluated together to assess surface streaking caused by a residual surfactant layer. The haziness determination turned out to be the key feature revealing the complex cleaning performance of multi-component products.